↓ Skip to main content

Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4772 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5208 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Published in
The Lancet, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61611-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harvey A Whiteford, Louisa Degenhardt, Jürgen Rehm, Amanda J Baxter, Alize J Ferrari, Holly E Erskine, Fiona J Charlson, Rosana E Norman, Abraham D Flaxman, Nicole Johns, Roy Burstein, Christopher JL Murray, Theo Vos

Abstract

We used data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) to estimate the burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years of life lost to premature mortality (YLLs), and years lived with disability (YLDs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 261 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 <1%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Norway 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Other 23 <1%
Unknown 5127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 845 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 673 13%
Researcher 628 12%
Student > Bachelor 516 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 359 7%
Other 964 19%
Unknown 1223 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1124 22%
Psychology 893 17%
Social Sciences 314 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 290 6%
Neuroscience 289 6%
Other 794 15%
Unknown 1504 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 597. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#38,993
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#784
of 42,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200
of 213,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#5
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.