↓ Skip to main content

Photonic doping of epsilon-near-zero media

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photonic doping of epsilon-near-zero media
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal2672
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iñigo Liberal, Ahmed M Mahmoud, Yue Li, Brian Edwards, Nader Engheta

Abstract

Doping a semiconductor with foreign atoms enables the control of its electrical and optical properties. We transplant the concept of doping to macroscopic photonics, demonstrating that two-dimensional dielectric particles immersed in a two-dimensional epsilon-near-zero medium act as dopants that modify the medium's effective permeability while keeping its effective permittivity near zero, independently of their positions within the host. The response of a large body can be tuned with a single impurity, including cases such as engineering perfect magnetic conductor and epsilon-and-mu-near-zero media with nonmagnetic constituents. This effect is experimentally demonstrated at microwave frequencies via the observation of geometry-independent tunneling. This methodology might provide a new pathway for engineering electromagnetic metamaterials and reconfigurable optical systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 220 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 31%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Professor 14 6%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 86 38%
Engineering 61 27%
Materials Science 14 6%
Chemistry 6 3%
Energy 2 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 49 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#627,673
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Science
#13,722
of 78,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,610
of 307,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#297
of 1,046 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,046 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.