↓ Skip to main content

Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012586
Authors

Ioannis D Gallos, Abey Eapen, Malcolm J Price, Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Nick S Macklon, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Yacoub Khalaf, Aurelio Tobias, Jonathan J Deeks, Madhurima Rajkhowa, Arri Coomarasamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,448,839
of 13,227,268 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,266
of 10,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,990
of 257,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#223
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,227,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.