You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Survival of Infants Born to HIV-Positive Mothers, by Feeding Modality, in Rakai, Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003877 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Kagaayi, Ronald H. Gray, Heena Brahmbhatt, Godfrey Kigozi, Fred Nalugoda, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, David Serwadda, Nelson Sewankambo, Veronica Ddungu, Darix Ssebagala, Joseph Sekasanvu, Grace Kigozi, Fredrick Makumbi, Noah Kiwanuka, Tom Lutalo, Steven J. Reynolds, Maria J. Wawer |
| Abstract |
Data comparing survival of formula-fed to breast-fed infants in programmatic settings are limited. We compared mortality and HIV-free of breast and formula-fed infants born to HIV-positive mothers in a program in rural, Rakai District Uganda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 28% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,795,150
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,220
of 202,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,323
of 169,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#137
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.