You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the diagnostic performance of orthopedic physical examination tests of the hip
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-257 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Labib Ataur Rahman, Sam Adie, Justine Maree Naylor, Rajat Mittal, Sarah So, Ian Andrew Harris |
| Abstract |
Previous reviews of the diagnostic performances of physical tests of the hip in orthopedics have drawn limited conclusions because of the low to moderate quality of primary studies published in the literature. This systematic review aims to build on these reviews by assessing a broad range of hip pathologies, and employing a more selective approach to the inclusion of studies in order to accurately gauge diagnostic performance for the purposes of making recommendations for clinical practice and future research. It specifically identifies tests which demonstrate strong and moderate diagnostic performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Thailand | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 25% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,531,827
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#709
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,088
of 205,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.