You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) on non-specific chronic back pain: a randomized controlled trial with additional exploration of the underlying mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-256 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonas Tesarz, Andreas Gerhardt, Sabine Leisner, Susanne Janke, Mechthild Hartmann, Günther H Seidler, Wolfgang Eich |
| Abstract |
Non-specific chronic back pain (CBP) is often accompanied by psychological trauma, but treatment for this associated condition is often insufficient.Nevertheless, despite the common co-occurrence of pain and psychological trauma, a specific trauma-focused approach for treating CBP has been neglected to date. Accordingly, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), originally developed as a treatment approach for posttraumatic stress disorders, is a promising approach for treating CBP in patients who have experienced psychological trauma.Thus, the aim of this study is to determine whether a standardized, short-term EMDR intervention added to treatment as usual (TAU) reduces pain intensity in CBP patients with psychological trauma vs. TAU alone. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 53 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,713,426
of 24,933,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,487
of 4,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,625
of 205,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#22
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,933,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.