↓ Skip to main content

Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocyte Membrane Protein 1 Diversity in Seven Genomes – Divide and Conquer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
317 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasmodium falciparum Erythrocyte Membrane Protein 1 Diversity in Seven Genomes – Divide and Conquer
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas S. Rask, Daniel A. Hansen, Thor G. Theander, Anders Gorm Pedersen, Thomas Lavstsen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Kenya 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 285 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 23%
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 8%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 45 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,639
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,821
of 98,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.