The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sweet potato for type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009128.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheow Peng Ooi, Seng Cheong Loke |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#419,732
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#698
of 13,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,993
of 210,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.