↓ Skip to main content

Labisia pumila regulates bone-related genes expressions in postmenopausal osteoporosis model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Labisia pumila regulates bone-related genes expressions in postmenopausal osteoporosis model
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siti Noor Fathilah, Norazlina Mohamed, Norliza Muhammad, Isa Naina Mohamed, Ima Nirwana Soelaiman, Ahmad Nazrun Shuid

Abstract

Labisia Pumila var. alata (LPva) has shown potential as an alternative to estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in prevention of estrogen-deficient osteoporosis. In earlier studies using postmenopausal model, LPva was able to reverse the ovariectomy-induced changes in biochemical markers, bone calcium, bone histomorphometric parameters and biomechanical strength. The mechanism behind these protective effects is unclear but LPva may have regulated factors that regulate bone remodeling. The aim of this study is to determine the bone-protective mechanism of LPva by measuring the expressions of several factors involved in bone formative and resorptive activities namely Osteoprotegerin (OPG), Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor kappa-B Ligand (RANKL), Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (MCSF) and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,928,728
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,118
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,006
of 196,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#18
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.