You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor Pontin, Matthias Schwannauer, Sara Tai, Peter Kinderman |
| Abstract |
The BBC Subjective Well-being scale (BBC-SWB) is a recently developed questionnaire designed to measure people's subjective experiences across the wide breadth of domains commonly included in definitions of well-being. Although it has previously been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of subjective well-being in the general population with good psychometric properties, a limitation of the initial version was that it was developed using responses on a 4-point Likert-style scale. This paper presents the psychometric properties, validity and reliability of a revised version of the scale conducted using 5-point Likert-style responses and tests the hypothesis that the scale measures three underlying dimensions of well-being; psychological; physical health; and relationships. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 75 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 86 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,963,672
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#813
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,388
of 208,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.