↓ Skip to main content

Legal, Ethical, and Procedural Bases for the Use of Aseptic Techniques to Implant Electronic Devices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Legal, Ethical, and Procedural Bases for the Use of Aseptic Techniques to Implant Electronic Devices
Published in
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, June 2013
DOI 10.3996/092012-jfwm-080
Authors

Daniel M. Mulcahy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,147,359
of 4,505,550 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#21
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,278
of 94,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,550 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.