You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: a comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eivor Oborn, Michael Barrett, Karl Prince, Girts Racko |
| Abstract |
Translating knowledge from research into clinical practice has emerged as a practice of increasing importance. This has led to the creation of new organizational entities designed to bridge knowledge between research and practice. Within the UK, the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) have been introduced to ensure that emphasis is placed in ensuring research is more effectively translated and implemented in clinical practice. Knowledge translation (KT) can be accomplished in various ways and is affected by the structures, activities, and coordination practices of organizations. We draw on concepts in the innovation literature--namely exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity--to examine these structures and activities as well as the ensuing tensions between research and implementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 41% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 23% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 39 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,362,200
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#505
of 1,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,677
of 201,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.