↓ Skip to main content

Blocking LIF action in the uterus by using a PEGylated antagonist prevents implantation: A nonhormonal contraceptive strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blocking LIF action in the uterus by using a PEGylated antagonist prevents implantation: A nonhormonal contraceptive strategy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2007
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710110104
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. A. White, J.-G. Zhang, L. A. Salamonsen, M. Baca, W. D. Fairlie, D. Metcalf, N. A. Nicola, L. Robb, E. Dimitriadis

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,782,445
of 15,306,144 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#49,256
of 84,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,267
of 260,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#688
of 993 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,306,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 993 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.