↓ Skip to main content

Attitudes toward Family Planning among HIV-Positive Pregnant Women Enrolled in a Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission Study in Kisumu, Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attitudes toward Family Planning among HIV-Positive Pregnant Women Enrolled in a Prevention of Mother-To-Child Transmission Study in Kisumu, Kenya
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066593
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Akelo, Sonali Girde, Craig B. Borkowf, Frank Angira, Kevin Achola, Richard Lando, Lisa A. Mills, Timothy K. Thomas, Shirley Lee Lecher

Abstract

Preventing unintended pregnancies among HIV-positive women through family planning (FP) reduces pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality, decreases the number of pediatric HIV infections, and has also proven to be a cost-effective way to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission. A key element of a comprehensive HIV prevention agenda, aimed at avoiding unintended pregnancies, is recognizing the attitudes towards FP among HIV-positive women and their spouse or partner. In this study, we analyze FP attitudes among HIV-infected pregnant women enrolled in a PMTCT clinical trial in Western Kenya.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 238 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 25%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 64 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Social Sciences 26 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 64 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,936,588
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,878
of 193,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,004
of 199,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#643
of 4,825 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,825 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.