↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Regression Analyses, Meta-Analyses, and Trial Sequential Analyses of the Effects of Supplementation with Beta-Carotene, Vitamin A, and Vitamin E Singly or in Different Combinations on All-Cause…

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-Regression Analyses, Meta-Analyses, and Trial Sequential Analyses of the Effects of Supplementation with Beta-Carotene, Vitamin A, and Vitamin E Singly or in Different Combinations on All-Cause Mortality: Do We Have Evidence for Lack of Harm?
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran Bjelakovic, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Christian Gluud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 46 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#503,181
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,933
of 225,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,725
of 210,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#162
of 5,104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.