The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatment of chronic non-healing ulcers using autologous platelet rich plasma: a case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-017-0324-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manish Suthar, Saniya Gupta, Suhail Bukhari, Venkatesh Ponemone |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 329 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 121 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 128 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,007,824
of 26,135,447 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#35
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,195
of 328,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,135,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.