↓ Skip to main content

Long-term health benefits of physical activity – a systematic review of longitudinal studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1719 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term health benefits of physical activity – a systematic review of longitudinal studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Reiner, Christina Niermann, Darko Jekauc, Alexander Woll

Abstract

The treatment of noncommunicable diseases (NCD), like coronary heart disease or type 2 diabetes mellitus, causes rising costs for the health system. Physical activity is supposed to reduce the risk for these diseases. Results of cross-sectional studies showed that physical activity is associated with better health, and that physical activity could prevent the development of these diseases. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing evidence for the long-term (>5 years) relationship between physical activity and weight gain, obesity, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease and dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,719 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1707 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 322 19%
Student > Master 302 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 207 12%
Researcher 127 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 78 5%
Other 243 14%
Unknown 440 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 273 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 263 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 193 11%
Psychology 107 6%
Social Sciences 95 6%
Other 271 16%
Unknown 517 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 363. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#89,068
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#74
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#540
of 212,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.