↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiota in Infants with and without Eczema

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Analysis of Fecal Microbiota in Infants with and without Eczema
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pei-Ying Hong, Bee Wah Lee, Marion Aw, Lynette Pei Chi Shek, Gaik Chin Yap, Kaw Yan Chua, Wen-Tso Liu

Abstract

Eczema is a chronic form of childhood disorder that is gaining in prevalence in affluent societies. Previous studies hypothesized that the development of eczema is correlated with changes in microbial profile and composition of early life endemic microbiota, but contradictory conclusions were obtained, possibly due to the lack of minimization of apparent non-health related confounders (e.g., age, antibiotic consumption, diet and mode of delivery). In this study, we recruited seven caesarean-delivered and total formula-fed infants, and comparatively examined the early-life endemic microbiota in these infants with and without eczema. Using 16S pyrosequencing, infants' fecal microbiota were observed to comprise Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes as the four main phyla, and the presence and absence of specific populations within these four phyla are primarily mediated by ageing. Quantitative analysis of bacterial targets on a larger sample size (n = 36 at 1, 3, and 12 months of age) revealed that the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae were different among caesarean-delivered infants with and without eczema, and the bacterial targets may be potential biomarkers that can correlate to the health status of these infants. Our overall findings suggest that the minimization of possible confounders is essential prior to comparative evaluation and correlation of fecal microbiota to health status, and that stool samples collected from caesarean-delivered infants at less than 1 year of age may represent a good cohort to study for potential biomarkers that can distinguish infants with eczema from those without. These findings would greatly facilitate future efforts in understanding the possible pathogenesis behind certain bacterial targets, and may lead to a timely intervention that reduces the occurrence of early life eczema and possibly allergic disorders in later life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 117 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,157
of 193,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,197
of 95,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#617
of 679 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 679 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.