You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The preference for an endoscopist specific sex: a link between ethnic origin, religious belief, socioeconomic status, and procedure type
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s48468 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adi Lahat, Assouline, L Katz, Fidder |
Abstract |
The sex of the physician performing the endoscopic procedure is one of the parameters influencing patient satisfaction. Our aim was to characterize patients' preferences according to their sex, socioeconomic status, and religious beliefs and according to procedure-related variables. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 23% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
Psychology | 3 | 10% |
Philosophy | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,766,781
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#732
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,668
of 201,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.