↓ Skip to main content

Were Rivers Flowing across the Sahara During the Last Interglacial? Implications for Human Migration through Africa

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
74 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Were Rivers Flowing across the Sahara During the Last Interglacial? Implications for Human Migration through Africa
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom J. Coulthard, Jorge A. Ramirez, Nick Barton, Mike Rogerson, Tim Brücher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 143 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Professor 12 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 16%
Arts and Humanities 20 13%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#165,858
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,483
of 222,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,098
of 211,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#55
of 4,998 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,998 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.