You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neurovirulent Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses in Sewage from Highly Immune Populations
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2006
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000069 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lester M. Shulman, Yossi Manor, Danit Sofer, Rachel Handsher, Tiberio Swartz, Francis Delpeyroux, Ella Mendelson |
Abstract |
Vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) have caused poliomyelitis outbreaks in communities with sub-optimal vaccination. Israeli environmental surveillance of sewage from populations with high (>95%) documented vaccine coverage of confirmed efficacy identified two separate evolutionary clusters of VDPVs: Group 1 (1998-2005, one system, population 1.6x10(6)) and Group 2 (2006, 2 systems, populations 0.7x10(6) and 5x10(4)). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Spain | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,370,584
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#52,088
of 215,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,683
of 168,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#57
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.