↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Odor Perceptual Similarity from Odor Structure

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting Odor Perceptual Similarity from Odor Structure
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kobi Snitz, Adi Yablonka, Tali Weiss, Idan Frumin, Rehan M. Khan, Noam Sobel

Abstract

To understand the brain mechanisms of olfaction we must understand the rules that govern the link between odorant structure and odorant perception. Natural odors are in fact mixtures made of many molecules, and there is currently no method to look at the molecular structure of such odorant-mixtures and predict their smell. In three separate experiments, we asked 139 subjects to rate the pairwise perceptual similarity of 64 odorant-mixtures ranging in size from 4 to 43 mono-molecular components. We then tested alternative models to link odorant-mixture structure to odorant-mixture perceptual similarity. Whereas a model that considered each mono-molecular component of a mixture separately provided a poor prediction of mixture similarity, a model that represented the mixture as a single structural vector provided consistent correlations between predicted and actual perceptual similarity (r≥0.49, p<0.001). An optimized version of this model yielded a correlation of r = 0.85 (p<0.001) between predicted and actual mixture similarity. In other words, we developed an algorithm that can look at the molecular structure of two novel odorant-mixtures, and predict their ensuing perceptual similarity. That this goal was attained using a model that considers the mixtures as a single vector is consistent with a synthetic rather than analytical brain processing mechanism in olfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 175 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor 10 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 25%
Neuroscience 33 17%
Chemistry 15 8%
Computer Science 15 8%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,642,426
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,363
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,444
of 211,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.