↓ Skip to main content

Perspectives of older adults on co-management of low back pain by doctors of chiropractic and family medicine physicians: a focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perspectives of older adults on co-management of low back pain by doctors of chiropractic and family medicine physicians: a focus group study
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin J Lyons, Stacie A Salsbury, Maria A Hondras, Mark E Jones, Andrew A Andresen, Christine M Goertz

Abstract

While older adults may seek care for low back pain (LBP) from both medical doctors (MDs) and doctors of chiropractic (DCs), co-management between these providers is uncommon. The purposes of this study were to describe the preferences of older adults for LBP co-management by MDs and DCs and to identify their concerns for receiving care under such a treatment model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Psychology 8 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,094,222
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#762
of 3,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,550
of 186,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#14
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.