↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions by general practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions by general practitioners
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003494.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus J.H. Huibers, Anna Beurskens, Gijs Bleijenberg, Constant Paul van Schayck

Abstract

Many patients visit their general practitioner (GP) because of problems that are psychosocial in origin. However, for many of these problems there is no evidence-based treatment available in primary care, and these patients place time-consuming demands on their GP. Therefore, GPs could benefit from tools to help these patients more effectively and efficiently. In this light, it is important to assess whether structured psychosocial interventions might be an appropriate tool for GPs. Previous reviews have shown that psychosocial interventions in primary care seem more effective than usual care. However, these interventions were mostly performed by health professionals other than the GP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 110 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 36 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 48%
Psychology 25 21%
Unspecified 14 12%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 6 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,403,282
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,630
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,893
of 159,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.