↓ Skip to main content

Spatial Learning and Action Planning in a Prefrontal Cortical Network Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial Learning and Action Planning in a Prefrontal Cortical Network Model
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louis-Emmanuel Martinet, Denis Sheynikhovich, Karim Benchenane, Angelo Arleo

Abstract

The interplay between hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) is fundamental to spatial cognition. Complementing hippocampal place coding, prefrontal representations provide more abstract and hierarchically organized memories suitable for decision making. We model a prefrontal network mediating distributed information processing for spatial learning and action planning. Specific connectivity and synaptic adaptation principles shape the recurrent dynamics of the network arranged in cortical minicolumns. We show how the PFC columnar organization is suitable for learning sparse topological-metrical representations from redundant hippocampal inputs. The recurrent nature of the network supports multilevel spatial processing, allowing structural features of the environment to be encoded. An activation diffusion mechanism spreads the neural activity through the column population leading to trajectory planning. The model provides a functional framework for interpreting the activity of PFC neurons recorded during navigation tasks. We illustrate the link from single unit activity to behavioral responses. The results suggest plausible neural mechanisms subserving the cognitive "insight" capability originally attributed to rodents by Tolman & Honzik. Our time course analysis of neural responses shows how the interaction between hippocampus and PFC can yield the encoding of manifold information pertinent to spatial planning, including prospective coding and distance-to-goal correlates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
France 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 28%
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Master 28 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 27%
Neuroscience 30 16%
Psychology 29 16%
Computer Science 23 12%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 22 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,491
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,655
of 123,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#32
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.