↓ Skip to main content

The challenge of archiving and preserving remotely sensed data

Overview of attention for article published in Data Science Journal, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The challenge of archiving and preserving remotely sensed data
Published in
Data Science Journal, January 2003
DOI 10.2481/dsj.2.159
Authors

John L. Faundeen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
United States 1 8%
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 5 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 46%
Environmental Science 3 23%
Social Sciences 3 23%
Chemistry 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,109,326
of 21,343,339 outputs
Outputs from Data Science Journal
#164
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,094
of 183,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Data Science Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them