↓ Skip to main content

Postprandial effect of dietary fat quantity and quality on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postprandial effect of dietary fat quantity and quality on arterial stiffness and wave reflection: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona E Lithander, Louise K Herlihy, Deirdre M Walsh, Emma Burke, Vivion Crowley, Azra Mahmud

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is a component of vascular function and an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease. There is a lack of conclusive evidence on the effect of a meal rich in monounsaturated fat (MUFA) compared with an isoenergetic meal rich in saturated fat (SFA) on postprandial vascular function and specifically on arterial stiffness.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 38%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,128,855
of 12,482,069 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#504
of 1,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,875
of 158,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,482,069 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.