↓ Skip to main content

Obstructive lung diseases and inhaler treatment: results from a national public pragmatic survey

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obstructive lung diseases and inhaler treatment: results from a national public pragmatic survey
Published in
Respiratory Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-14-94
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fulvio Braido, Ilaria Baiardini, Massimo Sumberesi, Francesco Blasi, Giorgio Walter Canonica

Abstract

The opinions held by the general population on obstructive lung disease and inhaler devices could influence asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) management and treatment adherence.The aim of the present public pragmatic survey was to evaluate the opinions, beliefs and perceptions of Italian people with respect to respiratory diseases as well as their perspectives on the use of inhaler devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Librarian 5 6%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,890
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,696
of 214,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.