↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of influenza vaccine against laboratory-confirmed influenza, in the late 2011–2012 season in Spain, among population targeted for vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of influenza vaccine against laboratory-confirmed influenza, in the late 2011–2012 season in Spain, among population targeted for vaccination
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Jiménez-Jorge, Salvador de Mateo, Concha Delgado-Sanz, Francisco Pozo, Inmaculada Casas, Manuel Garcia-Cenoz, Jesús Castilla, Esteban Pérez, Virtudes Gallardo, Carolina Rodriguez, Tomás Vega, Carmen Quiñones, Eva Martínez, Juana María Vanrell, Jaume Giménez, Daniel Castrillejo, María del Carmen Serrano, Julián Mauro Ramos, Amparo Larrauri

Abstract

In Spain, the influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) was estimated in the last three seasons using the observational study cycEVA conducted in the frame of the existing Spanish Influenza Sentinel Surveillance System. The objective of the study was to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against medically attended, laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (ILI) among the target groups for vaccination in Spain in the 2011-2012 season. We also studied influenza VE in the early (weeks 52/2011-7/2012) and late (weeks 8-14/2012) phases of the epidemic and according to time since vaccination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Vietnam 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#985,096
of 25,217,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#229
of 8,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,528
of 209,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,217,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.