↓ Skip to main content

Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002751.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente, María Melero-Bascones

Abstract

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACDR CPR) uses a hand-held suction device, applied mid-sternum, to compress the chest then actively decompress the chest after each compression. Randomised controlled trials testing this device have shown discordant results.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 129 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 40 29%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 23 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,273,100
of 14,337,042 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,856
of 10,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,576
of 165,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,337,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.