You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djw302 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker, Lesley McGuffog, Daniel Barrowdale, Andrew Lee, Penny Soucy, Sue Healey, Joe Dennis, Michael Lush, Mark Robson, Amanda B. Spurdle, Susan J. Ramus, Nasim Mavaddat, Mary Beth Terry, Susan L. Neuhausen, Ute Hamann, Melissa Southey, Esther M. John, Wendy K. Chung, Mary B. Daly, Saundra S. Buys, David E. Goldgar, Cecilia M. Dorfling, Elizabeth J. van Rensburg, Yuan Chun Ding, Bent Ejlertsen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Thomas V. O. Hansen, Susan Slager, Emily Hallberg, Javier Benitez, Ana Osorio, Nancy Cohen, William Lawler, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Paolo Peterlongo, Valeria Pensotti, Riccardo Dolcetti, Monica Barile, Bernardo Bonanni, Jacopo Azzollini, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Paolo Radice, Antonella Savarese, Laura Papi, Giuseppe Giannini, Florentia Fostira, Irene Konstantopoulou, Julian Adlard, Carole Brewer, Jackie Cook, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana Eccles, Ros Eeles, Steve Ellis, Debra Frost, Shirley Hodgson, Louise Izatt, Fiona Lalloo, Kai-ren Ong, Andrew K. Godwin, Norbert Arnold, Bernd Dworniczak, Christoph Engel, Andrea Gehrig, Eric Hahnen, Jan Hauke, Karin Kast, Alfons Meindl, Dieter Niederacher, Rita Katharina Schmutzler, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Laure Barjhoux, Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame, Camille Elan, Lisa Golmard, Emmanuelle Barouk-Simonet, Fabienne Lesueur, Sylvie Mazoyer, Joanna Sokolowska, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Claudine Isaacs, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Bruce Poppe, Miguel de la Hoya, Vanesa Garcia-Barberan, Kristiina Aittomäki, Heli Nevanlinna, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, J. L. de Lange, Encarna B. Gómez Garcia, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Carolien M. Kets, Hanne E. J. Meijers-Heijboer, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Matti A. Rookus, Christi J. van Asperen, Ans M. W. van den Ouweland, Helena C. van Doorn, Theo A. M. van Os, Ava Kwong, Edith Olah, Orland Diez, Joan Brunet, Conxi Lazaro, Alex Teulé, Jacek Gronwald, Anna Jakubowska, Katarzyna Kaczmarek, Jan Lubinski, Grzegorz Sukiennicki, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Jocelyne Chiquette, Simona Agata, Marco Montagna, Manuel R. Teixeira, Sue Kyung Park, Curtis Olswold, Marc Tischkowitz, Lenka Foretova, Pragna Gaddam, Joseph Vijai, Georg Pfeiler, Christine Rappaport-Fuerhauser, Christian F. Singer, Muy-Kheng M. Tea, Mark H. Greene, Jennifer T. Loud, Gad Rennert, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Peter J. Hulick, John L. Hays, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Julie Martyn, Gord Glendon, Anna Marie Mulligan, Irene L. Andrulis, Amanda Ewart Toland, Uffe Birk Jensen, Torben A. Kruse, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Mads Thomassen, Maria A. Caligo, Soo-Hwang Teo, Raanan Berger, Eitan Friedman, Yael Laitman, Brita Arver, Ake Borg, Hans Ehrencrona, Johanna Rantala, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Patricia A. Ganz, Robert L. Nussbaum, Angela R. Bradbury, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson, Banu K. Arun, Paul James, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Lester, Jacques Simard, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Kenneth Offit, Fergus J. Couch, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton, Antonis C. Antoniou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 279 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 96 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 107 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,359,004
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,543
of 7,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,921
of 322,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#30
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.