↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
452 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001090.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marissa M Alejandria, Mary Ann D Lansang, Leonila F Dans, Jacinto Blas Mantaring

Abstract

Mortality from sepsis and septic shock remains high. Results of trials on intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) as adjunctive therapy for sepsis have been conflicting. This is an update of a Cochrane review that was originally published in 1999 and updated in 2002 and 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 452 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 439 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 54 12%
Researcher 52 12%
Student > Master 49 11%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 7%
Other 99 22%
Unknown 116 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 130 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,774,800
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,811
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,695
of 199,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.