You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making Choices While Smelling, Tasting, and Listening: The Role of Sensory (Dis)similarity When Sequentially Sampling Products
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Marketing, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1509/jm.12.0325 |
| Authors |
Dipayan Biswas, Lauren I. Labrecque, Donald R. Lehmann, Ereni Markos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 69% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 115 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 7% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,424,903
of 23,917,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Marketing
#396
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,620
of 312,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Marketing
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.