↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of chronic plantar fasciopathy with extracorporeal shock waves (review)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of chronic plantar fasciopathy with extracorporeal shock waves (review)
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-8-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Schmitz, Nikolaus BM Császár, Jan-Dirk Rompe, Humberto Chaves, John P Furia

Abstract

There is an increasing interest by doctors and patients in extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for chronic plantar fasciopathy (PF), particularly in second generation radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (RSWT). The present review aims at serving this interest by providing a comprehensive overview on physical and medical definitions of shock waves and a detailed assessment of the quality and significance of the randomized clinical trials published on ESWT and RSWT as it is used to treat chronic PF. Both ESWT and RSWT are safe, effective, and technically easy treatments for chronic PF. The main advantages of RSWT over ESWT are the lack of need for any anesthesia during the treatment and the demonstrated long-term treatment success (demonstrated at both 6 and 12 months after the first treatment using RSWT, compared to follow-up intervals of no more than 12 weeks after the first treatment using ESWT). In recent years, a greater understanding of the clinical outcomes in ESWT and RSWT for chronic PF has arisen in relationship not only in the design of studies, but also in procedure, energy level, and shock wave propagation. Either procedure should be considered for patients 18 years of age or older with chronic PF prior to surgical intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 144 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Other 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,081,571
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#127
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,767
of 208,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.