↓ Skip to main content

Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis in Patients Undergoing TKA: How Common and How Serious?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis in Patients Undergoing TKA: How Common and How Serious?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3298-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chong Bum Chang, Kun Woo Park, Yeon Gwi Kang, Tae Kyun Kim

Abstract

Information on the coexistence of lumbar spondylosis and its influence on overall levels of pain and function in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) would be valuable for patient consultation and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,962
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,508
of 215,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#53
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.