↓ Skip to main content

SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT — how do these taxonomies compare?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
102 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1046 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT — how do these taxonomies compare?
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12864-017-3501-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Balvočiūtė, Daniel H. Huson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,046 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 1036 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 222 21%
Researcher 191 18%
Student > Master 147 14%
Student > Bachelor 104 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 5%
Other 126 12%
Unknown 201 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 295 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 232 22%
Environmental Science 77 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 53 5%
Computer Science 32 3%
Other 117 11%
Unknown 240 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#635,930
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#65
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,343
of 321,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#5
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.