You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Congenital lobar emphysema: 30-year case series in two university hospitals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1806-37132013000400004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele Cristina Cataneo, Olavo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Erica Nishida Hasimoto, Aurelino Fernandes Schmidt, Antonio José Maria Cataneo |
| Abstract |
To review the cases of patients with congenital lobar emphysema (CLE) submitted to surgical treatment at two university hospitals over a 30-year period. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#147
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,417
of 291,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#11
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.