↓ Skip to main content

Increased burden and severity of metabolic syndrome and arterial stiffness in treatment-naïve HIV+ patients from Cameroon

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased burden and severity of metabolic syndrome and arterial stiffness in treatment-naïve HIV+ patients from Cameroon
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, September 2013
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s42350
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Ngatchou, Daniel Lemogoum, Pierre Ndobo, Euloge Yagnigni, Emiline Tiogou, Elisabeth Nga, Charles Kouanfack, Philippe van de Borne, Michel P Hermans

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and its therapy are associated with increased aortic stiffness and metabolic syndrome (MetS) phenotype in Caucasian patients. We hypothesized that, independently of antiretroviral therapy, HIV infection in native black African patients is associated with increased burden of cardiometabolic risk factors that may accelerate arterial structural damage and translate into increased aortic stiffness.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,044,080
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#390
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,170
of 204,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.