↓ Skip to main content

Field-Portable Pixel Super-Resolution Colour Microscope

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field-Portable Pixel Super-Resolution Colour Microscope
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0076475
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alon Greenbaum, Najva Akbari, Alborz Feizi, Wei Luo, Aydogan Ozcan

Abstract

Based on partially-coherent digital in-line holography, we report a field-portable microscope that can render lensfree colour images over a wide field-of-view of e.g., >20 mm(2). This computational holographic microscope weighs less than 145 grams with dimensions smaller than 17×6×5 cm, making it especially suitable for field settings and point-of-care use. In this lensfree imaging design, we merged a colorization algorithm with a source shifting based multi-height pixel super-resolution technique to mitigate 'rainbow' like colour artefacts that are typical in holographic imaging. This image processing scheme is based on transforming the colour components of an RGB image into YUV colour space, which separates colour information from brightness component of an image. The resolution of our super-resolution colour microscope was characterized using a USAF test chart to confirm sub-micron spatial resolution, even for reconstructions that employ multi-height phase recovery to handle dense and connected objects. To further demonstrate the performance of this colour microscope Papanicolaou (Pap) smears were also successfully imaged. This field-portable and wide-field computational colour microscope could be useful for tele-medicine applications in resource poor settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 57 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Physics and Astronomy 9 8%
Computer Science 5 4%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,262,342
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,781
of 195,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,456
of 204,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#734
of 4,882 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,882 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.