You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenocopy – A Strategy to Qualify Chemical Compounds during Hit-to-Lead and/or Lead Optimization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Baum, Ramona Schmid, Carina Ittrich, Werner Rust, Katrin Fundel-Clemens, Susanne Siewert, Martin Baur, Lisa Mara, Lore Gruenbaum, Armin Heckel, Roland Eils, Roland E. Kontermann, Gerald J. Roth, Florian Gantner, Andreas Schnapp, John E. Park, Andreas Weith, Karsten Quast, Detlev Mennerich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,874
of 195,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,521
of 181,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#502
of 1,013 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,013 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.