You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0074521 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian-Hong Zhong, A. Chapin Rodríguez, Na-Na Yang, Le-Qun Li |
Abstract |
This review aimed to comprehensively assess the literature examining a possible link between the rs1801133 polymorphism (677C → T) in the gene encoding the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,203,867
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,131
of 193,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,367
of 196,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,375
of 5,049 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,049 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.