↓ Skip to main content

Interrater and intrarater reliability of photoplethysmography for measuring toe blood pressure and toe‐brachial index in people with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interrater and intrarater reliability of photoplethysmography for measuring toe blood pressure and toe‐brachial index in people with diabetes mellitus
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-5-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Scanlon, Kris Park, David Mapletoft, Lindy Begg, Joshua Burns

Abstract

A reliable tool to measure arterial flow to the feet in people with diabetes is required given that they are particularly prone to peripheral arterial disease. Traditionally, the ankle brachial index (ABI) has been used to measure arterial circulation, but its application is limited due to calcification of larger arteries. More recently, toe pressure and the toe brachial index (TBI) has been suggested as superior to ABI measurements because they assess smaller digital arteries less prone to arterial calcification. However, reliability studies for the clinical use of photoplethysmography (PPG) in people with diabetes are lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Engineering 5 12%
Computer Science 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 21%