↓ Skip to main content

Exploration of experiences in therapeutic groups for patients with severe mental illness: development of the Ferrara group experiences scale (FE- GES)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploration of experiences in therapeutic groups for patients with severe mental illness: development of the Ferrara group experiences scale (FE- GES)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosangela Caruso, Luigi Grassi, Bruno Biancosino, Luciana Marmai, Luciano Bonatti, Maria Moscara, Marco Rigatelli, Catherine Carr, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Group therapies are routinely provided for patients with severe mental illness. The factors important to the group experience of patients are still poorly understood and are rarely measured. To support further research and practice, we aimed to develop a questionnaire that captures how patients experience groups within a community mental health context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,348,542
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,846
of 4,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,366
of 207,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#71
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.