↓ Skip to main content

Imaging structural and functional brain networks in temporal lobe epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging structural and functional brain networks in temporal lobe epilepsy
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boris C. Bernhardt, SeokJun Hong, Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi

Abstract

Early imaging studies in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) focused on the search for mesial temporal sclerosis, as its surgical removal results in clinically meaningful improvement in about 70% of patients. Nevertheless, a considerable subgroup of patients continues to suffer from post-operative seizures. Although the reasons for surgical failure are not fully understood, electrophysiological and imaging data suggest that anomalies extending beyond the temporal lobe may have negative impact on outcome. This hypothesis has revived the concept of human epilepsy as a disorder of distributed brain networks. Recent methodological advances in non-invasive neuroimaging have led to quantify structural and functional networks in vivo. While structural networks can be inferred from diffusion MRI tractography and inter-regional covariance patterns of structural measures such as cortical thickness, functional connectivity is generally computed based on statistical dependencies of neurophysiological time-series, measured through functional MRI or electroencephalographic techniques. This review considers the application of advanced analytical methods in structural and functional connectivity analyses in TLE. We will specifically highlight findings from graph-theoretical analysis that allow assessing the topological organization of brain networks. These studies have provided compelling evidence that TLE is a system disorder with profound alterations in local and distributed networks. In addition, there is emerging evidence for the utility of network properties as clinical diagnostic markers. Nowadays, a network perspective is considered to be essential to the understanding of the development, progression, and management of epilepsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 314 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 19%
Researcher 59 18%
Student > Master 40 12%
Other 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 58 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 75 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 8%
Psychology 26 8%
Engineering 22 7%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 75 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,146,965
of 24,490,209 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,454
of 7,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,641
of 290,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#568
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,490,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.