↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 33,315)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
1338 tweeters
facebook
177 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
23 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huseyin Naci, John P A Ioannidis, H. Naci, J. P. A. Ioannidis

Abstract

To determine the comparative effectiveness of exercise versus drug interventions on mortality outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,338 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 13 3%
United States 12 2%
Brazil 7 1%
France 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 449 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 15%
Student > Master 66 13%
Other 58 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 10%
Other 163 32%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 281 55%
Sports and Recreations 63 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 11%
Psychology 29 6%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Other 57 11%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1645. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#465
of 7,921,502 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#24
of 33,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 139,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,921,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.