Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 31,640)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
51 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
twitter
1345 tweeters
facebook
177 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
23 Google+ users
video
2 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huseyin Naci, John P A Ioannidis, H. Naci, J. P. A. Ioannidis

Abstract

To determine the comparative effectiveness of exercise versus drug interventions on mortality outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,345 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 15 3%
United States 12 2%
Brazil 7 1%
France 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 449 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 14%
Student > Master 61 12%
Other 59 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 53 10%
Other 175 34%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 290 56%
Sports and Recreations 59 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 11%
Psychology 28 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 4%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1657. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#389
of 7,437,848 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#18
of 31,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11
of 136,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,437,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.