You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Field evaluation in Chad of community usage of CD4 T lymphocyte counting by alternative single-platform flow cytometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-373 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Donato Koyalta, Mohammad-Ali Jenabian, Barou Djouater, Noël Djemadji-Oudjeil, Francois-Xavier Mbopi-Keou, Angélique Ndjoyi-Mbiguino, Laurent Bélec |
Abstract |
Field and community evaluation of the routine usage of CD4 T counting platforms is essential in resource-poor countries for efficient and cost-effective monitoring of HIV-infected adults and children attending health care centers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 6 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 18% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,697,777
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,261
of 7,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,209
of 207,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#106
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.