You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of photodynamic inactivation (PDI) using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human keratocytes in vitro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00417-013-2470-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiong Wang, Tanja Stachon, Timo Eppig, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, Nóra Szentmáry |
| Abstract |
Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) may be a potential alternative in cases of therapy-resistant infectious keratitis. The purpose of our study was to determine the impact of PDI using the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) on viability, apoptosis, and proliferation of human keratocytes, in vitro. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,945,760
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,738
of 221,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.