You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does an ‘Activity-Permissive’ Workplace Change Office Workers’ Sitting and Activity Time?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0076723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin Gorman, Maureen C. Ashe, David W. Dunstan, Heather M. Hanson, Ken Madden, Elisabeth A. H. Winkler, Heather A. McKay, Genevieve N. Healy |
| Abstract |
To describe changes in workplace physical activity, and health-, and work-related outcomes, in workers who transitioned from a conventional to an 'activity-permissive' workplace. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 27% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Psychology | 13 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 57 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,558,306
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,195
of 225,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,811
of 221,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#504
of 5,039 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,039 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.