↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Allowable Take of Migratory Birds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing Allowable Take of Migratory Birds
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, May 2009
DOI 10.2193/2008-090
Authors

Michael C. Runge, John R. Sauer, Michael L. Avery, Bradley F. Blackwell, Mark D. Koneff

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 80 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Other 9 9%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 54%
Environmental Science 19 20%
Engineering 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 17 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,663,706
of 20,506,309 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#759
of 2,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,504
of 281,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,506,309 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.