You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Tuberculosis (TB) Prevention Effectiveness in Children of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccines from Different Sources, Kazakhstan
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032567 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Favorov, Mohammad Ali, Aigul Tursunbayeva, Indira Aitmagambetova, Paul Kilgore, Shakhimurat Ismailov, Terence Chorba |
Abstract |
Except during a 1-year period when BCG vaccine was not routinely administered, annual coverage of infants with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Kazakhstan since 2002 has exceeded 95%. BCG preparations from different sources (Japan, Serbia, and Russia) or none were used exclusively in comparable 7-month time-frames, September through March, in 4 successive years beginning in 2002. Our objective was to assess relative effectiveness of BCG immunization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 18% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,763,624
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,980
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,068
of 157,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#947
of 3,515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.